Skip to main content

2 Kings 5 | Part 1| Background

 This is a multi part sermon note from 2 Kings 5. There are at least four people here in this Bible chapter and though a character study is needed, the main point is to examine oneself with the same premise and see how the Gospel of Jesus relates to the main issues in this portion. The Bible is meant to show us both an issue and provide an answer to it and the hope of the answer is found in the life of Jesus.

Background

Firstly, let us look at the background of the story. There are some key understandings that i have moved from the below passages to here to help the reader understand though they may only provide some information to the points I wish to captivate your attention to.


There had been a number of attacks by Syria ( also known as Aram - this means i would use Syria and Aram interchangeably in these notes) during the reign of Hadadezer ( King of Aram 865 - 642 BC) and Jehoram ( King of Israel 849–842 BC). Seeing 2 Kings 5:1-2, we read about Naaman being the commander of the armies of Aram. This is a position similar to the modern day Prime Minister or the Chief of Armies. This is a very powerful, important, strategic and prime role. This person is often the right hand man of the King. Often the wars involved prisoner of wars where people were taken as slaves and often made to work for the captor. There are historical records of Hadadezer in the  Kurkh Monoliths, and Jehoram in the Tel Dan Stele artefacts. 


Another factor to keep in mind is the trifacta of the ancient cultures - Land, Language (People, Tribe) and Lord (God). The ancient cultures were based around rivers. This meant that the river often took the position of God or the river was the source of all blessing. Infact, the civilization was based around the river. For example, the Indus valley civilisation near the Indus river in south asia, the Tigris and Euphrates for the Syrian - Mesopotamian civilisation, the Nile river for Egypt. This is why the gods Indra, Hadad, Hapi were some of the common deities respectively. This is a point that I would ask you to keep in mind as we continue this study. We see similar understanding even in the book of Ruth, where  Ruth tells Naomi that your Land is my Land, Your People my People and your God is my God.


Naaman has the Tzaraat which is translated as Leprosy. However, this may not be the leprosy that we know today as this disease came from South Asia to the middle east much later during the time of Alexander the Great. The diseases share similar symptoms but were called so as there was no need to create detailed names for skin diseases that could not be treated. All it meant was there was significant disfigurement of the skin. I am not going to dive into this topic but have stated this here so that you may consider looking this up on your time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Nativity - by Gari Melchers

This could be my first ever critique of art that I have ever written and that is because it is only recently art has captured my interest as much as this work. This write up is made both in English and German as I want to practice my German.  'The Nativity' by Gari Melchers.  I am not an art expert and my critique is from a layman's point of view, but bear with me. I have tried reading some information about the art and the culture behind it and I have my two favourite blog posts about the same work and yes,  I have shamelessly copied some of their thoughts. Woebegone but Hopeful and other is by Lisa VO . Julius Garibaldi Melchers (August 11, 1860 – November 30, 1932) was an American artist. He was one of the leading American proponents of naturalism. He won a 1932 Gold medal from the American Academy of Arts and Letters.[1] - Wikipedia The Nativity is painted during the peak of realism movement - in a gritty and less idealised manner . For m

Ist Jesus vom Tod auferstanden?

  Vor ein paar Monaten, erzählte mir ein Freund (nennen wir ihn Herr Müller) von einem peinlichen Vorfall. Er lebte, in einem kleinen Dorf und jeder kannte jeden. Er hatte einen Nachbarn (nennen wir ihn Herrn Schmidt). Herr Müller und Herr Schmidt waren sehr freundliche Familienväter. Jeder hatte zwei Töchter. Herr Müller hatte einen kleinen Dackel, während Herr Schmidt, ein paar Kaninchen hatte. Eines Tages wurde Herr Müller durch einen erschreckenden Anblick geweckt. Sein Hund hatte eines der kleinen Kaninchen im Maul. Sie können sich vorstellen, wie entsetzt er war. Sein Hund war über den Zaun zum Nachbarhaus gesprungen und hatte dort irgendwie ein eingesperrtes Kaninchen angegriffen. Herr Müller fühlte sich sehr schlecht dabei, aber er hatte nicht den Mut, Herrn Schmidt zu sagen. Er dachte sich einen schlauen Plan aus. Er nahm das Kaninchen, wusch es ab, schüttelte seine Fell mit einem Fön auf und schminkte es, um die Bisswunden zu entfernen. Er band seinen Hund an einem Ort an, de

2 Kings 5 | Part 2 | Naaman and the Offense of the cross

This section of the story in 2 Kings chapter 5 focuses on Naaman. We know that Naaman was the commander in chief of the armies of Syria and possibly the right hand man as he was incharge of strategic, political and warfare and security. This was a very prestigious role that Naaman had earned. Some Jewish Rabbis say that his ruthlessness and his power resulted in God punishing Naaman with Tzaraat which is translated as Leprosy. For the sake of these notes, I would consider the word Leprosy.  Naaman was powerful and wise. In fact, it was God who had blessed him from the start. The verse says that Naaman was a powerful and influential man valued by the king greatly. His victory was a gift from God to Aram. Why would God bless a foreign nation to attack the Israelites? In Deuteronomy chapter 28, Moses tells the people that God would make the enemies of Israel punish the people of God if they are disobedient. Jehoram, the then king of Israel was the son of Ahab. Ahab and his wife Jezebel le